Controversial US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Terminates Humanitarian Work

Relief work in the region
The GHF had halted its food distribution centers in Gaza following the ceasefire took effect six weeks ago

The disputed, United States and Israel-funded GHF aid organization declares it is winding down its aid operations in the Gaza region, after almost six months.

The group had previously halted its three food distribution sites in Gaza subsequent to the ceasefire between Hamas and Israel took effect six weeks ago.

The GHF aimed to bypass the UN as the primary provider of aid to Gaza's population.

United Nations organizations and other humanitarian groups refused to co-operate with its methodology, stating it was improper and dangerous.

Many residents were fatally wounded while attempting to obtain sustenance amid chaotic scenes near GHF's sites, mainly through Israeli military action, as reported by United Nations.

Israeli authorities stated its troops fired alerting fire.

Operation Conclusion

The foundation announced on Monday that it was winding down operations now because of the "successful completion of its humanitarian effort", with a total of three million packages containing the corresponding to over 187 million food portions provided to residents.

The foundation's chief officer, Jon Acree, also said the American-directed Civil-Military Coordination Center - which has been established to help execute the American administration's Gaza initiative - would be "adopting and expanding the model GHF piloted".

"The foundation's approach, in which Hamas could no longer loot and profit from stealing aid, had major impact in bringing Palestinian factions to negotiations and securing a halt in hostilities."

Comments and Positions

The militant group - which disputes allegations of misappropriation - approved the termination of the aid organization, according to reports.

An official from declared the foundation should be subject to scrutiny for the negative impact it created to Palestinians.

"We urge all international human rights organisations to make certain that consequences are faced after causing the death and injury of many residents and covering up the starvation policy employed by the Israeli government."

Organization Timeline

The foundation started work in Gaza on 26 May, a seven days following Israeli authorities had somewhat relaxed a complete restriction on aid and commercial deliveries to Gaza that continued for 77 days and led to substantial deficiencies of necessary provisions.

Three months later, a food crisis was announced in the Gaza metropolitan area.

The foundation's nourishment distribution centers in various parts of the Palestinian territory were managed by American private security firms and situated within regions under Israeli military authority.

Aid Organization Objections

The UN and its partners claimed the system violated the core assistance standards of objectivity, fairness and autonomy, and that guiding distressed residents into military-controlled areas was intrinsically hazardous.

The UN's human rights office reported it tracked the killing of at least 859 Palestinians attempting to obtain nourishment in the proximity to foundation locations between late May through end of July.

An additional 514 individuals were killed near the routes of UN and other aid convoys, it added.

Most of them were fatally wounded by the Israel's armed forces, according to the office.

Divergent Narratives

The Israeli military claimed its soldiers had released alerting fire at individuals who came near them in a "threatening" way.

The organization declared there were no shootings at the aid sites and alleged that United Nations of using "inaccurate and deceptive" data from the Palestinian health authority administered by Hamas.

Ongoing Situation

The organization's continuation had been unclear since Hamas and Israel agreed a ceasefire deal to implement the first phase of the United States' reconciliation proposal.

It said relief provision would take place "absent meddling from the two parties through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in combination with other international institutions not associated in any manner" with militant groups and the Israeli government.

United Nations representative the UN spokesman stated recently that the foundation's closure would have "no impact" on its activities "because we never worked with them".

He also said that while increased relief was entering the region since the halt in hostilities began on early October, it was "inadequate to meet all the needs" of the 2.1 million residents.

Jennifer Woods
Jennifer Woods

An avid hiker and environmental writer sharing insights from global trails and sustainable living practices.

February 2026 Blog Roll

Popular Post